× Newsroom Bitcoin News Opinions Bitcoin Treasury Bitcoin Academy Bitcoin Events Bitcoin Retirement Contact

Why Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft Rejected Bitcoin for Corporate Treasury

Original Source

While some companies have embraced Bitcoin as a strategic asset, tech giants Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft have resisted the trend, rejecting proposals to add the cryptocurrency to their corporate treasuries. This decision is driven by several key factors that underscore the challenges of adopting Bitcoin in the financial operations of large corporations . One of the primary reasons is Bitcoin's extreme volatility .

Why Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft Rejected Bitcoin for Corporate Treasury

While some companies have embraced Bitcoin as a strategic asset, tech giants Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft have resisted the trend, rejecting proposals to add the cryptocurrency to their corporate treasuries. This decision is driven by several key factors that underscore the challenges of adopting Bitcoin in the financial operations of large corporations.

One of the primary reasons is Bitcoin's extreme volatility. Its price swings, which can exceed 50% in a matter of months, introduce significant uncertainty into financial planning and create volatility in earnings and financial positions for public companies. This instability runs counter to the core tenets of traditional treasury management, which prioritize capital preservation and risk minimization. Shareholders in these tech giants have shown a preference for maintaining predictability and stability.

Regulatory uncertainty is another major hurdle. The lack of clear and consistent regulation for crypto assets adds a layer of risk that large public companies are reluctant to take on. The ever-shifting legal and tax goalposts make compliance and long-term strategy difficult.

Accounting rules further complicate the issue. Recently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new rules requiring companies to measure crypto assets at their current fair market value, with changes reported directly in net income. This means the volatile swings of Bitcoin will now directly impact a company's financial bottom line, offering a more transparent picture of their crypto market exposure. Prior to these rules, Bitcoin was treated as an intangible asset, which could be written down in value but not revalued upwards, creating asymmetrical risk.

Finally, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) concerns play a role. These companies prefer to invest in their core business or return capital to shareholders rather than engage in what they view as speculative treasury management.